Usefulness of Indocyanine Green Plasma Disappearance Rate in Liver Donors and Recipients: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Determination of indocyanine green (ICG) plasma disappearance rate (PDR) is a simple, inexpensive, and noninvasive tool to assess liver perfusion, absorption, and elimination. Its application in the liver transplant process has not been widely incorporated in clinical practice. This study aims to assess the usefulness of ICG PDR in the donor selection setting and in the early post-transplant phase and to analyze its variation between these 2 time points. METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective observational study. ICG clearance test was performed in 50 brain-dead donors (T0-PDR) to assess concordance with graft suitability. Rejected grafts biopsy specimens were analyzed to correlate histology with T0-PDR. In the recipients, ICG PDR was performed before wound closure (T1-PDR). The association of T0, T1, and T0-T1 variation with the development of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 23 of 50 grafts were discarded because of poor macroscopic quality. A T0-PDR below 15.5%/min could predict graft rejection with 100% specificity and 69.6% sensitivity. All the biopsy specimens from donors with PDR < 10 %/min showed liver fibrosis. A total of 25 of the remaining 27 grafts were implanted; 5 patients (20%) developed EAD. T1-PDR performed better than T0-T1 variation to predict dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: ICG PDR could be used in the donors as a filter to discard poor-quality grafts before procurement and, in the early post-transplant phase, to predict EAD.

Relationship between the anatomical location and the selective non-operative management of penetrating stab wounds in the abdomen.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between the anatomical location of penetrating abdominal stab wounds (SW) and the rate of selective non-operative management (SNOM) based on that location is scarcely reflected in the specialized literature. Our main objective has been to assess this rate based on the anatomical location, and our results. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective registry of abdominal trauma from April 1993 to June 2020. The two study groups considered were the Operative Management (OM), and the SNOM, including in this one the use of diagnostic laparoscopy. Penetrating SWs in the abdomen were classified according to anatomical location. RESULTS: We identified 259 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. SNOM was applied in 31% of the patients with a success rate of 96%, and it was more frequent in the lumbar, flank, and thoraco-abdominal regions; within the anterior abdomen it was more applicable in the RH, followed by the LH and epigastrium, respectively. An unnecessary laparotomy was done in 21% of patients, with the highest number in the epigastrium. Taking into account the unnecessary laparotomies and the rates of successful SNOM, 70.5% of lumbar, 66.5% of epigastric, 62% of flank, and 59% of RH penetrating SW could have been managed without a laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: SNOM of penetrating SW in the abdomen has been safer and more applicable in those located in the lumbar, flank, epigastric, and RH regions.

Relación entre la localización anatómica y el manejo selectivo no operatorio de las heridas por arma blanca penetrantes en abdomen / Relationship between the anatomical location and the selective non-operative management of penetrating stab wounds in the abdomen

Introducción: La localización anatómica de las heridas por arma blanca (HAB) penetrantes en abdomen y su relación con el manejo selectivo no operatorio (MSNO) tiene escaso reflejo en la literatura especializada. Nuestro objetivo principal ha sido valorar la tasa de MSNO en función de esa localización anatómica, y sus resultados. Métodos: Revisión retrospectiva del registro prospectivo de trauma abdominal desde abril de 1993 hasta junio de 2020. Los dos grupos a estudio fueron manejo operatorio (MO) y MSNO, incluyendo en este último grupo el uso de laparoscopias exploradoras como método diagnóstico. Se clasificaron las HAB penetrantes en abdomen en función de su localización anatómica. Resultados: Identificamos 259 pacientes que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. El MSNO se aplicó en el 31% de los pacientes, con una tasa de éxito del 96,5%. En las HAB de las regiones lumbares, flancos y toracoabdominales fue donde se optó más frecuentemente por este manejo; y en el abdomen anterior fue más aplicable en el hipocondrio derecho (HD), seguido del hipocondrio izquierdo (HI) y epigastrio. Se realizó una laparotomía innecesaria en el 21%, con la cifra más alta en el epigastrio. Teniendo en cuenta los porcentajes de MSNO y laparotomías evitables en cada región, el 70,5% de las HAB lumbares, el 66,5% de las epigástricas, el 62% de flancos y el 59% de HD se podrían haber manejado con éxito sin laparotomía. Conclusiones: El MSNO de las HAB penetrantes en abdomen ha resultado más seguro y aplicable en las localizadas en las regiones lumbares, flancos, epigastrio e HD (AU)

Introduction: The relationship between the anatomical location of penetrating abdominal stab wounds (SW) and the rate of selective non-operative management (SNOM) based on that location is scarcely reflected in the specialized literature. Our main objective has been to assess this rate based on the anatomical location, and our results. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospective registry of abdominal trauma from April 1993 to June 2020. The two study groups considered were the Operative Management (OM), and the SNOM, including in this one the use of diagnostic laparoscopy. Penetrating SWs in the abdomen were classified according to anatomical location. Results: We identified 259 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. SNOM was applied in 31% of the patients with a success rate of 96%, and it was more frequent in the lumbar, flank, and thoraco-abdominal regions; within the anterior abdomen it was more applicable in the RUQ, followed by the LUQ and epigastrium, respectively. An unnecessary laparotomy was done in 21% of patients, with the highest number in the epigastrium. Taking into account the unnecessary laparotomies and the rates of successful SNOM, 70,5% of lumbar, el 66,5% of epigastric, 62% of flank, and 59% of RUQ penetrating SWs could have been managed without a laparotomy. Conclusions: SNOM of penetrating SWs in the abdomen has been safer and more applicable in those located in the lumbar, flank, epigastric, and RUQ regions (AU)

Relationship between the anatomical location and the selective non-operative management of penetrating stab wounds in the abdomen. / Relación entre la localización anatómica y el manejo selectivo no operatorio de las heridas por arma blanca penetrantes en abdomen.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between the anatomical location of penetrating abdominal stab wounds (SW) and the rate of selective non-operative management (SNOM) based on that location is scarcely reflected in the specialized literature. Our main objective has been to assess this rate based on the anatomical location, and our results. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective registry of abdominal trauma from April 1993 to June 2020. The two study groups considered were the Operative Management (OM), and the SNOM, including in this one the use of diagnostic laparoscopy. Penetrating SWs in the abdomen were classified according to anatomical location. RESULTS: We identified 259 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. SNOM was applied in 31% of the patients with a success rate of 96%, and it was more frequent in the lumbar, flank, and thoraco-abdominal regions; within the anterior abdomen it was more applicable in the RUQ, followed by the LUQ and epigastrium, respectively. An unnecessary laparotomy was done in 21% of patients, with the highest number in the epigastrium. Taking into account the unnecessary laparotomies and the rates of successful SNOM, 70,5% of lumbar, el 66,5% of epigastric, 62% of flank, and 59% of RUQ penetrating SWs could have been managed without a laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: SNOM of penetrating SWs in the abdomen has been safer and more applicable in those located in the lumbar, flank, epigastric, and RUQ regions.